Durability is Associated with Higher Resistance to Fatigue in Elite vs Recreational Cyclists
Keywords:
Road Cycling, Fatigue, Durability, Critical Power, W'Abstract
Introduction — In road cycling, the ability to perform maximum intensity efforts after hours of racing, or durability, can make a difference between winning and losing [1]. Specifically, differences between World Class and Continental-level athletes are best observed in the fatigued state [2][3][4], yet the reasons behind these level-dependent variations remain unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the effect of prolonged duration exercise with interspersed maximal efforts on performance and fatigability in recreationally-trained and elite cyclists.
Subjects — Eighteen male cyclists from different levels have completed the study, among which twelve recreational (Age : 25 ± 3.1, Height : 180 ± 7.3 cm , Weight : 70 ± 8.8 kg, %Fat mass: 13 ± 3.2 % , VO2max : 61.9 ± 7.3 mL/min/kg, Critical Power (CP) : 298 ± 31 W) and six elite-level cyclists (Age : 23 ± 1.9, Height : 179 ± 5.0 cm , Weight : 71 ± 8.6 kg, %Fat mass: 12 ± 1.3%, VO2 max : 75.8 ± 5.4 mL/min/kg, CP : 378 ± 62 W).
Methodology—Participants rode on cycle ergometer (Cyclus2, RBM electronics, Germany) in the moderate intensity domain (90% VT1) interspersed with three exhausting bouts destined to deplete W’ (3-min-all-out test, 3AOT) [5] at 0, 90 and 180min elapsed. Power and heart rate (HR) were continuously monitored (Garmin HRM-Dual monitor). Blood lactate (Lactate scout, EFK Diagnostics), expired gases exchanges (Ultima CCMTM) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE, 6-20 Borg scale) were recorded every 30 min during moderate intensity bouts. Expired gases were measured during, and lactate concentration measured 30-s after each 3AOT. Knee extensor maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) were measured after warm-up, immediately after each 3AOT, and again 10 minutes post each 3AOT (Strain Gauge, Tedea Huntleigh).
Statistics — The normality of the distribution was assessed using a Shapiro-Wilk test, followed by an evaluation of variance homogeneity using a Levene test. Time and group effects in CP, W’, Peak power, VO2max and lactate concentration were assessed using analysis of variance models (ANOVAs). Significant main effects were followed-up by Bonferroni post-hoc procedures. Significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results — Elite cyclists were characterised by higher CP (378 ± 62 vs 298 ± 31 W), VO2max (75.8 ± 5.4 vs 61.9 ± 7.3 mL/min/kg), peak power (721 ± 96 vs 591 ± 98 W) and VT1 (244 ± 45 vs 199 ± 29W) than recreational cyclists. During moderate intensity cycling, there were no significant group or time differences in VO2, [La], RPE and HR. There were also no group differences in carbohydrate (CHO) consumption (2.3 ± 0.5 vs 2.2 ± 0.4 g/min) despite the higher absolute intensity and energy cost (20 ± 3 vs 17 ± 2 kcal.min-1) in the elite group. There were significant alterations from 1st to 3rd 3AOT, in total work (elite: 75 ± 9 vs 81 ± 10 kJ; recreational : 59 ± 10 vs 62 ± 9 kJ) and [La] (elite: 13.4 ± 3.2 vs 8.0 ± 2.9 mmol.L-1 ; recreational: 9.2 ± 3.9 vs 7.6 ± 2.9 mmol.L-1). However, W' decreased significantly only in recreational cyclists (10.1 ± 1.4 vs 12.4 ± 9.1 kJ). There were no significant changes in CP or VO2peak during the three 3AOT for both groups. Knee extensor MVC decreased notably only in recreational group at the end of the session (122 ± 29 vs 104 ± 32 Nm) and after each all-out test. No differences in relative voluntary activation were found in either group.
Conclusion — The main finding of this study highlighted the increased fatigue experienced by recreational athletes compared to elite cyclists during extended exercise. These results are consistent with prior research [6], indicating a decrease in W' among recreational-trained cyclists. However, this decline is not observed in elite athletes, who demonstrate superior ability to repeat all-out efforts. This heightened fatigability is characterized by a greater degree of peripheral fatigue among recreational cyclists. Despite elite athletes demonstrating higher total work, greater work output during each 3AOT, and expending more of their W' reserve during each 3AOT, there were no differences in initial force and W' between the groups afterward. Moreover, elite cyclists exhibited similar CHO consumption but a greater contribution of fat to total energy expenditure at moderate intensity compared to recreational athletes.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Science and Cycling

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Journal of Science and Cycling agree to publish their articles under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND license, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to Cycling Research Center.


