Longitudinal bending stiffness of cycling footwear - What is stiff enough?
Keywords:
longitudinal stiffness, footwear, biomechanics, bicyclingAbstract
To investigate the influence of a cycling shoe’s longitudinal bending stiffness on the kinematics of the cyclist’s foot, three identical leisure-cycling shoes for flat pedals with different longitudinal bending stiffness were tested during indoor trials with twelve male subjects riding at five intensities in seated and standing cycling, respectively. Using an infrared-based 3D motion capture system and power output measurement with a crank-based power meter it was shown that power output does not differ significantly between shoes with different sole stiffness, that metatarsophalangeal angle between forefoot and rearfoot is increasing with increasing power and mostly decreasing with increasing bending stiffness of the shoe and that the pedal angle over crank-cycle shows individual differences that can be clustered in three types. Ultimately it can be said that Ethylenvinylacetat (EVA) inlays show excessive bending whereas there is only a small difference between nylon and nylon-carbon inlays.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Science and Cycling
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Journal of Science and Cycling agree to publish their articles under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND license, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to Cycling Research Center.